Is “The basic annals only objectively record that the abdication edict was produced from the sleeve, while the biography records that it was proactively prepared in advance to flatter, but was instead looked down upon by Taizu.” true?
"History of Song·Taizu Basic Annals 1" only records: 'He summoned the civil and military officials, and by late afternoon, the ranks were set. Hanlin Academician Tao Gu produced the abdication edict of Emperor Gong of Zhou from his sleeve, and the ceremonial official led Taizu to the court, where he faced north and bowed to receive it. Then he was assisted up to Chongyuan Hall, donned the imperial robes and crown, and ascended the throne.' "History of Song·Biographies of Tao Gu, Hu Meng, Wang Zhu, Wang Hu, Zhi, Yang Zhaojian, Yu Chongliang, Zhang Dan, Gao Xi, Mian" records that this act was proactive flattery and was instead looked down upon: 'Initially, when Taizu was about to receive the abdication, there was no abdication text. Gu was nearby, took it out from his bosom and presented it, saying: "It is already done." Taizu greatly despised him.'
Differences in emotional tone regarding the presentation of the abdication edict
This page was extracted from classical texts with AI assistance and revised; errors remain possible. Spotted a mistake? Tell us →