Is “The biographical arrangement and evaluation of Han Xin, King of Han, who surrendered to the Xiongnu, in official histories.” true?

histories differ

In the Records of the Grand Historian, 'The Biographies of Han Xin and Lu Wan,' Han Xin, King of Han, is grouped with Lu Wan, lamenting that they rose by deceit and force and ended in distress, fleeing to the Xiongnu: 'Han Xin and Lu Wan were not of a generation that accumulated virtue and goodness; they seized momentary changes and succeeded through deceit and force. Encountering the early stability of the Han, they were able to obtain territories and face south as lords. Internally suspected by the powerful, externally relying on the barbarians for support, they thus became increasingly estranged and endangered. When their affairs were exhausted and their wisdom was strained, they finally fled to the Xiongnu. Was it not pitiful!' In the History of Han, 'The Biographies of Wei Bao, Tian Dan, and Han Xin,' he is instead grouped with Wei Bao and Tian Dan, viewing him as a descendant of the old nobility of the Six Kingdoms: 'During the conflict between Chu and Han, heroes became kings; only Wei Bao, Han Xin, and the Tian Dan brothers were descendants of the old states, but they were all cut off in their own lifetimes.'

Han Xin, King of Han

In the Records of the Grand Historian, Han Xin, King of Han, is grouped with Lu Wan in a joint biography, lamenting their flight to the Xiongnu; the History of Han changes this to a joint biography with Wei Bao and Tian Dan, discussing the legacy of the Six Kingdoms.

Sources cited above. Compiled with AI assistance and checked against those sources; for cultural reference.Data & method →

This page was extracted from classical texts with AI assistance and revised; errors remain possible. Spotted a mistake? Tell us →