CIVILIZATION DOSSIER
Ji An汲黯
Commandant of the Palace Guard, often requested private audiences with Gongsun Hong and confronted him in court about his deceit.
- DIRECT FIGURES
- 7
- RELATION RECORDS
- 11
- SOURCE WORKS
- 2
RELATIONSHIP COMPASS
Ji An, and the people around them.
Open one chapter at a time. Each chapter gives the relationship first, then the source text behind it.
01ALLEGIANCEAllegiance
Rulers, appointments and allegiance
2 figures · 3 records+
Allegiance
Rulers, appointments and allegiance
Emperor Wu of Han→Ji Anrespect
Emperor Xuan of Han→Ji Anpromote rank
02CONFLICTConflict
Battles, captures and defeat
4 figures · 6 records+
Conflict
Battles, captures and defeat
Gongsun Hong→Ji Anresent
Ji An→Zhang Tangaccuse
Ji An→Emperor Wu of Handirect remonstrance
Tian Fen→Ji Andiscourteous
03THE UNSEENMythic acts
Transformation, aid and divine punishment
2 figures · 2 records+
Mythic acts
Transformation, aid and divine punishment
Wei Qing→Ji Anrespect
Ji An→Li Xiwarn
8 key relationships are shown here. The complete record remains below.
Across source works
How this figure changes across texts
Works are shown side by side, not as a chronology. No influence between texts is inferred.
- Official history10 profile notes
Book of Han
8 relations8 verified quotations- Emperor Wu of Han→ respect →Ji An
- Ji An→ serve lord →Emperor Wu of Han
- Emperor Xuan of Han→ promote rank →Ji An
- Ji An→ accuse →Zhang Tang
Verified original text · 8
至如见黯,不冠不见也
respect · Book of Han, 张冯汲郑传
上使汲黯、郑当时兴人徒塞之
dispatch · Book of Han, 沟洫志
6 more verified quotations in the relationship records below.
- Official history6 profile notes
Records of the Grand Historian
6 relations6 verified quotations- Ji An→ direct remonstrance →Emperor Wu of Han
- Wei Qing→ respect →Ji An
- Ji An→ accuse →Zhang Tang
- Gongsun Hong→ resent →Ji An
Verified original text · 6
陛下内多欲而外施仁义,奈何欲效唐虞之治乎!
direct remonstrance · Records of the Grand Historian, 汲郑列传
大将军闻,愈贤黯,数请问国家朝廷所疑
respect · Records of the Grand Historian, 汲郑列传
4 more verified quotations in the relationship records below.
Where the histories differ
In the Records of the Grand Historian, Ji An laments the fickleness of retainers and the coldness of human relationships; in the History of Han, he is placed in a joint biography of four men and honored as a good minister of the restoration.
- histories differThe categorization and evaluation of Ji An's direct remonstrations in official histories
In the Records of the Grand Historian, 'The Biographies of Ji An and Zheng Dangshi' places Ji An in a joint biography with Zheng Dangshi. The Grand Historian, through the words of Duke Zhai, laments the coldness of human relationships when one loses power: 'The Grand Historian says: With the worthiness of Ji and Zheng, when they had power, their retainers were ten times as many; when they lost power, they were not so. How much more so for ordinary people! Duke Zhai of Xiagui had a saying: When Duke Zhai was Commandant of Justice, his guests filled the gate; when he was dismissed, one could set a sparrow trap outside the gate.' In the History of Han, 'The Biographies of Zhang Shizhi, Feng Tang, Ji An, and Zheng Dangshi' expands this to a joint biography of four ministers: Zhang Shizhi, Feng Tang, Ji An, and Zheng Dangshi. The eulogy defines their political character: 'Zhang Shizhi's upholding of the law, Feng Tang's discussion of generals, Ji An's uprightness, Zheng Dangshi's recommendation of scholars—without these, how could they have become famous?'
Relationship network
Original text (2)
至如见黯,不冠不见也
上使汲黯、郑当时兴人徒塞之
Original relation: dispatch · Book of Han, 沟洫志
Original text (1)
陛下内多欲而外施仁义,奈何欲效唐虞之治乎!
Original text (1)
武帝即位,黯为谒者
Original text (1)
秩黯诸侯相
Original text (1)
大将军闻,愈贤黯,数请问国家朝廷所疑
Original text (2)
黯质责汤于上前
黯数质责汤于上前
Original relation: confront · Records of the Grand Historian, 汲郑列传
Original text (1)
弘、汤心疾黯
Original text (2)
弘、汤心疾黯
丞相公孙弘曰…………黯诽谤圣制,当族
Original relation: impeach · Records of the Grand Historian, 乐书
Original text (1)
黯常毁儒,面触弘等
Original text (1)
黯见蚡,未尝拜,揖之
Original text (2)
谓大行李息曰
黯既辞行,过大行李息,曰………………公列九卿,不早言之,公与之俱受其僇矣